ASSESSMENTS

Going Viral: The Geopolitics of the Flu

Jan 16, 2018 | 18:46 GMT

An emergency hospital with rows and rows of sick patients in hospital beds at Camp Funston during the 1918 flu pandemic.

Sick patients fill the beds at an emergency hospital at Camp Funston, Kansas, during the 1918 flu pandemic. It is hypothesized that the flu began in southwestern Kansas and spread globally once it made its way to the nearby military training camp.

(NATIONAL MUSEUM OF HEALTH AND MEDICINE/AFIP)

Highlights

  • On the 100-year anniversary of the 1918 flu pandemic, the Northern Hemisphere's flu season is poised to be a rough one.
  • Medical advances and technology have helped people effectively combat a multitude of diseases, but the risk of a flu pandemic remains.
  • Technological innovations in data analytics could help prevent the spread of disease, but they could face policy roadblocks.

In the span of about a year from 1918 to 1919, the Spanish influenza killed an estimated 20 million to 50 million people around the world. Many of the outside factors that contributed to the severity of the outbreak were unique to their time. The wartime world was more connected, allowing the virus to spread faster than ever, but the still-nascent understanding of how diseases worked meant that sanitation guidelines and treatment methods were lagging. Meanwhile, World War I had ravaged economies and populations across the globe and contributed to media censoring that prevented information about the virus to be shared. Since then, vaccines and medicines have been developed to fight all sorts of diseases. Moreover, humans now have the capability to more closely track the spread of disease, through social media and the 24-hour news cycle. And yet, the influenza virus, with its own ability to rapidly mutate and...

Keep Reading

Register to read three free articles

Proceed to sign up

Register Now

Already have an account?

Sign In