ASSESSMENTS

Trade Profile: South Africa Prioritizes Populism at the Cost of Competitiveness

Jul 3, 2017 | 11:30 GMT

South Africa's abundance of natural resources means that it has not had to focus on developing robust global trade agreements.

(Shutterstock)

Editor's Note

Global trade is changing. The kinds of multilateral agreements that characterized the postwar years have stalled out over the past two decades, prompting countries and economic blocs to try to negotiate smaller deals with fewer partners. Nations and blocs have more leeway under this new model to negotiate the trade agreements that best suit their interests and to avoid those that don't. Now, more than ever, the future of international trade depends on a country or bloc's defensive interests, offensive interests and underlying factors of production. Our fortnightly Trade Profiles aim to break down these factors to facilitate an understanding of where global trade stands today and where it's headed.
 
In the fourth installment, we focus on South Africa.

Historically, South Africa has been indifferent to global trade. Because raw commodities, the mainstay of its export activity, are generally not subject to protection by other states, South Africa has had little incentive to aggressively negotiate global trade deals. It typically relied instead on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and later the World Trade Organization, to govern its international dealings, while focusing most of its attention on regional commerce. Given its long-standing advantages relative to the rest of southern Africa in sectors such as manufacturing and services, South Africa's emphasis on regional trade has helped it dominate its neighbors economically. But its wealth of natural resources and comparatively diverse industries notwithstanding, the country's politics have frequently hindered its competitiveness abroad....

Subscribe to view this article

Subscribe Now

Subscribe

Already have an account?