COLUMNS

A Truth About 'Post-Truth'

Dec 4, 2016 | 14:15 GMT

The narrative rivers of the media world all too often ignore the good or evil of their tributaries.
The narrative rivers of the media world all too often ignore the good or evil of their tributaries.

(TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images)

Nearly a month has passed since American voters gave the presidency, seemingly against all odds, to Donald Trump. And for nearly a month a global chorus of pundits, pollsters and media prophets have asked: How did just about everyone get it wrong? Amid the hand-wringing, the list of culprits is long: Skewed models of voter bases. The demise of landline telephones. Underestimates of "lapsed voters." The evolution of game-changing social media. Wishful thinking. In the stream of post-election postmortems on journalism's performance, "post-truth" is the handiest of explanations in a campaign season that took fibs and fabrication to a new level. The Oxford English Dictionary has declared "post-truth" its International Word of the Year. A Google search on the term yields some 240 million results. Layer what the candidates said against the "fake news" manufactured on Facebook and elsewhere and, for some, this is all but a civilizational threat....

Keep Reading

Register to read three free articles

Proceed to sign up

Register Now

Already have an account?

Sign In