On Security

Vetting Against the Odds

Mike Parks
Senior Protective Intelligence Analyst, Stratfor
Jun 23, 2016 | 08:00 GMT
Most employee vetting in the private sector consists of a single, pre-employment records check.
Without proper expert interpretation and follow-up, even rigorous screening methods such as psychometric tests and polygraphs can fail to give employers an accurate picture of a prospective or current employee's character and trustworthiness.
(DIMA KOROTAYEV/Epsilon/Getty Images)

For law enforcement officials and the public at large, the investigation of Omar Mateen, the gunman behind the June 12 mass shooting in Orlando, has raised as many questions as it has answered. What were his motivations? What was the state of his mental health? How did it happen that the FBI, which twice investigated Mateen, did not have him under active surveillance at the time of the attack? And why was he still employed in good standing as an armed security officer with G4S, the world's largest security services provider, at the time of the attack? The answer to this last question, at least, has already surfaced. By GS4's own account, Mateen underwent a pre-employment screening in 2007, including criminal background checks, credit checks and, according to one report, a psychometric test. The company reinvestigated Mateen for cause in 2013, around the same time that the FBI was looking...

Connected Content

Regions & Countries

Article Search

Copyright © Stratfor Enterprises, LLC. All rights reserved.

Stratfor Worldview


To empower members to confidently understand and navigate a continuously changing and complex global environment.